i told you so.
yes, the ball crossed the line. but if you ask me, it shouldn't be a goal anyway. giggs slid into cech, and i think it should be a foul anyway. i mean, players shouldnt be allowed to slide in that sort of manner into a keeper who has got the ball already. so ja, even though giggs' momentum pushed cech past the line, it isn't a goal.
and well, man u paid 30 million for rio ferdinand.
man u has lost the last two games of their campaign. and seriously they weren't that fantastic towards the end of whatever competition you want to talk about. they were able to field reserves at stamford bridge only because arsenal had done the job for them. so what, you ask. the reserves drew 0-0. but if that game had something to be played for, don't you think it could ahve been different?
ronaldo, so long the best player in england, was really spluttering towards the end. burnt-out? maybe. but i thought he was largely anonymous in the final, as he was in milan.
the final was rather boring, especially the first half. the game only started to open up after the resumption. and it took a moment of magic from drogba and lampard to create the winning goal. but for a certain period, man u were better, and another period, chelsea better.
but ultimately, man u will feel the pain. the pain of playing well (relatively), getting the better chances, and not getting the result. you ahve been lucky. but not anymore. it's about time. you may have played nice football 70 percent of the time, but i think people flatter you.
because you are not as good as you seem. as milan have shown.
what i ahve seen gives me a lot of optimism. there would be no domination. we have a very good chance next season, whether or not henry leaves. but that is another matter. and i never believe the board should interfere in affairs on the pitch. but if things have to come to this, then we have to accept it and get through it. it's a test. we just have to make sure we don't do anything rash or stupid. then next season should be very different.
never forget, but we have beaten the league champions home and away.
and i told you, chelsea would somehow win the fa cup.
and well, man u paid 30 million for rio ferdinand.
man u has lost the last two games of their campaign. and seriously they weren't that fantastic towards the end of whatever competition you want to talk about. they were able to field reserves at stamford bridge only because arsenal had done the job for them. so what, you ask. the reserves drew 0-0. but if that game had something to be played for, don't you think it could ahve been different?
ronaldo, so long the best player in england, was really spluttering towards the end. burnt-out? maybe. but i thought he was largely anonymous in the final, as he was in milan.
the final was rather boring, especially the first half. the game only started to open up after the resumption. and it took a moment of magic from drogba and lampard to create the winning goal. but for a certain period, man u were better, and another period, chelsea better.
but ultimately, man u will feel the pain. the pain of playing well (relatively), getting the better chances, and not getting the result. you ahve been lucky. but not anymore. it's about time. you may have played nice football 70 percent of the time, but i think people flatter you.
because you are not as good as you seem. as milan have shown.
what i ahve seen gives me a lot of optimism. there would be no domination. we have a very good chance next season, whether or not henry leaves. but that is another matter. and i never believe the board should interfere in affairs on the pitch. but if things have to come to this, then we have to accept it and get through it. it's a test. we just have to make sure we don't do anything rash or stupid. then next season should be very different.
never forget, but we have beaten the league champions home and away.
and i told you, chelsea would somehow win the fa cup.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home