and i think lille can play much better football than chelsea.
was down with food poisoning. but recovered in time to watch the match. man utd v lille.
lille can play neat passing football. it's a pity they didnt play liddat in the 2nd half. they were certainly capable of entertaining. and its nice to see them daring to attack away. if only they played like how they played in the first half. slick passing. but they didnt. nevertheless, they are still more entertaining than chelsea. hey, at least their passes are in the middle and attacking thirds. AND you wonder how chelsea was shown to have made only 30% long balls. simple: they played many many many short passes between their defence. so the absolute number is very big. yeah, u get the point.
whoever said chelsea is infallible must be the biggest blind clown on this earth. open your eyes and watch chelsea play. their play is so flawed. and i am not talking about how defensive they are. i am referring to their tactical flaws. overshifting, a longball tactic that can be stopped by some good positional play and keeper coming out to act as a sweeper, as liverpool had shown. even their defence is not as good as u think. and when a team only sits back and defend and hit you on the counter, you know its for you to win. seriously, i am still unfazed by bolton and liverpools 4-1 defeats. unless chelsea dominates opponents, there is no reason to fear them. they are just converting the few chances they have, thats all.
only teams that totally dominate you, deserve your fear and respect.
was down with food poisoning. but recovered in time to watch the match. man utd v lille.
lille can play neat passing football. it's a pity they didnt play liddat in the 2nd half. they were certainly capable of entertaining. and its nice to see them daring to attack away. if only they played like how they played in the first half. slick passing. but they didnt. nevertheless, they are still more entertaining than chelsea. hey, at least their passes are in the middle and attacking thirds. AND you wonder how chelsea was shown to have made only 30% long balls. simple: they played many many many short passes between their defence. so the absolute number is very big. yeah, u get the point.
whoever said chelsea is infallible must be the biggest blind clown on this earth. open your eyes and watch chelsea play. their play is so flawed. and i am not talking about how defensive they are. i am referring to their tactical flaws. overshifting, a longball tactic that can be stopped by some good positional play and keeper coming out to act as a sweeper, as liverpool had shown. even their defence is not as good as u think. and when a team only sits back and defend and hit you on the counter, you know its for you to win. seriously, i am still unfazed by bolton and liverpools 4-1 defeats. unless chelsea dominates opponents, there is no reason to fear them. they are just converting the few chances they have, thats all.
only teams that totally dominate you, deserve your fear and respect.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home