he must hate green alot.
it just occured to me that sometimes you keep thinking about the guy running behind you, worrying that he's catching up.
maybe he's thinking: oh shit, i can't catch up with him.
so maybe you should be thinking: he can't catch me.
looking like something doesn't mean it's something.
like people thinking you look like that sort doesnt necessarily mean you are that sort.
anyway, valencia are through to the next round with a 2-2 draw at shaktar. it is disappointing not to have won, but you must admit that to get results in the far east is always very difficult. somehow. the eastern cold, i suppose. but it makes football romantic actually, all these "strongholds", real or imagined. in fact, i think if you can shut yourself from the crowd and all these perceptions, maybe home advantage would not exist.
werder bremen might be 2 points ahead of barcelona, but i have a feeling that when they meet on the last day, barcelona would sneak it and break german hearts. in any case, barcelona can regain the initiative by beating sofia and hoping chelsea beat bremen. if that happens, then bremen might beat barcelona on the last day to qualify.
whatever it is, i think it is all set for a grand finale to that group. someone will break someone's heart in the cruelest, yet most spectacular of fashion.
that's the romantic part about football.
anyway, a few days ago, i came across some criticism of murakami, after murakami claimed that he felt disgust and sadness when he comes across kogaru and ganguro(basically some kind of fashion style). yes, i like murakami's works, but the whole article was quite absurd. i mean, they slammed him for being narrow-minded and went on to criticise his works and him. they explained that they had to go back, to examine murakami in order to explain why murakami said what he said(i would agree with this approach, actually).
but, basically if you ask me, i think they were talking crap. i looked at it very objectively and i conclude that either they are like dennis bergkamp who can see a space to pass into when no one else can, or i am a complete fool, which incidentally i don't think i am. their argument is crap. there is no link at all, however hard they try. they are trying to say that murakami said that because he is murakami and of course they painted a very unflattering picture of him. all that without really using murakami's background to prove their point, to prove that murakami is indeed murakami, though they provided much of it. i think they are trying to say that smart people can never say stupid things and stupid people can never say intelligent things, which is of course not true, since there is no 100% in this world.
to sum it all up, it leaves me feeling that they said what they said because they don't like his works. simply because they don't like his works.
it is really too biased. like my rants against chelsea and "chelsea with an A".
make them earn their pay. don't let them exploit you. they should earn their pay.
maybe he's thinking: oh shit, i can't catch up with him.
so maybe you should be thinking: he can't catch me.
looking like something doesn't mean it's something.
like people thinking you look like that sort doesnt necessarily mean you are that sort.
anyway, valencia are through to the next round with a 2-2 draw at shaktar. it is disappointing not to have won, but you must admit that to get results in the far east is always very difficult. somehow. the eastern cold, i suppose. but it makes football romantic actually, all these "strongholds", real or imagined. in fact, i think if you can shut yourself from the crowd and all these perceptions, maybe home advantage would not exist.
werder bremen might be 2 points ahead of barcelona, but i have a feeling that when they meet on the last day, barcelona would sneak it and break german hearts. in any case, barcelona can regain the initiative by beating sofia and hoping chelsea beat bremen. if that happens, then bremen might beat barcelona on the last day to qualify.
whatever it is, i think it is all set for a grand finale to that group. someone will break someone's heart in the cruelest, yet most spectacular of fashion.
that's the romantic part about football.
anyway, a few days ago, i came across some criticism of murakami, after murakami claimed that he felt disgust and sadness when he comes across kogaru and ganguro(basically some kind of fashion style). yes, i like murakami's works, but the whole article was quite absurd. i mean, they slammed him for being narrow-minded and went on to criticise his works and him. they explained that they had to go back, to examine murakami in order to explain why murakami said what he said(i would agree with this approach, actually).
but, basically if you ask me, i think they were talking crap. i looked at it very objectively and i conclude that either they are like dennis bergkamp who can see a space to pass into when no one else can, or i am a complete fool, which incidentally i don't think i am. their argument is crap. there is no link at all, however hard they try. they are trying to say that murakami said that because he is murakami and of course they painted a very unflattering picture of him. all that without really using murakami's background to prove their point, to prove that murakami is indeed murakami, though they provided much of it. i think they are trying to say that smart people can never say stupid things and stupid people can never say intelligent things, which is of course not true, since there is no 100% in this world.
to sum it all up, it leaves me feeling that they said what they said because they don't like his works. simply because they don't like his works.
it is really too biased. like my rants against chelsea and "chelsea with an A".
make them earn their pay. don't let them exploit you. they should earn their pay.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home